<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Immigration Law Blog &#187; Deportation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/category/deportation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com</link>
	<description>Attorney Farhad Sethna - Tel (330) 384-8000 or (877) 7US-VISA - www.Immigration-America.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 12:47:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Common Sense Approach to Padilla v. Kentucky- Competent Representation in Criminal Cases with Immigration Implications</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/195</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/195#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fsethna2009</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Immigration Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.immigration-america.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawyer advising a non-citizen client in a criminal matter has an added duty:  to advise the client of the immigration consequences, if any, of a criminal conviction. Failure to advise that results in a deportable consequence or some other immigration detriment, such as inability to naturalize or exclusion, could be the grounds for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Padilla that could result in the underlying conviction being reopened and vacated.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/195/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Law SB 1070 Exposes a Disturbing Trend</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/191</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/191#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fsethna2009</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Policy Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Immigration Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.immigration-america.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arizona Law SB 1070 uses the logic of "immigration compliance" to needlessly trample on the US Constitution, harms US citizens and the non-immigrants alike and damages genuine law enforcement efforts to curb crime.  Severe flaws in the law subject it to strict scrutiny and possible injunction or reversal in the courts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/191/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court issues PADILLA v. KENTUCKY Decision on Immigration Consequences of Criminal Conviction</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/187</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/187#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fsethna2009</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Immigration Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.immigration-america.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Supreme Court issues a landmark decision that could affect the reopening and reduction of criminal sentences if the alien was given poor advice or no advice on the immigration consequences of a criminal conviction. Notable is the concurrence (agreement) by Justices Alito and Roberts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/187/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if my NTA was never issued?</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/67</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/67#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asylum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.immigration-america.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an actual question I received via e-mail:
&#8220;Is there an expiry date allowing relief if there has never been issued an NTA? My example is where, after a statement at a port of entry was given and a temporary green card with a one year validity was issued, an NTA was never received and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/67/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration Court Hearings Are Not A Joke!</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/126</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/126#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.immigration-america.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gravity of Immigration Court Hearings explained]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/126/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMMIGRATION COURT EXPLAINED: PART III: Relief from Removal</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/65</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/65#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Parts I and II of this series, I wrote of how a case gets to immigration court and subsequently the basics of immigration court including what to expect at an immigration hearing. In Part III of this series, I would like to discuss the avenues for “relief from removal” when your case is in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/65/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Registration: A Special Alert on the NSEERS Program</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/52</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/52#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.s240101933.onlinehome.us/wp251/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Special Registration is a requirement imposed by the Attorney  General of the United States. Only non-immigrant MALES above 16 years of age  from certain countries must register with the INS by specified dates. The  technical name for the special registration program is &#8220;NSEERS&#8221; for &#8220;National  Security Entry Exit Registration System.&#8221;
WHO MUST [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/52/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Till ICE Do Us Part: Immigration Consequences of crimes against family members and children</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/43</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/43#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.s240101933.onlinehome.us/wp251/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Till ICE Do Us Part: Immigration consequences of crimes against family members and children
by Farhad Sethna
Each week, I receive at least one phone call from a fellow attorney or legal aid provider posing the question: “I represent a client who is a non-citizen on a charge of domestic violence&#8230;.what are the immigration consequences&#8230;?”  So if [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/43/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pendulum Swings Back: Supreme Court Decisions Offer Relief to Immigrants</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/42</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/42#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.s240101933.onlinehome.us/wp251/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In late June 2001 the United States Supreme Court issued rulings in two  cases, Immigration and Naturalization Service v St. Cyr, 00-767 and Zadvydas v.  Davis, 99-7791. Coming as they did, nearly 4 ½ years after Congress passed  sweeping and harsh immigration reforms in the Illegal Immigration Reform and  Immigrant Responsibility [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/42/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration Court Explained: Part II &#8211; Master Hearing and Individual Hearing</title>
		<link>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/41</link>
		<comments>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/41#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.s240101933.onlinehome.us/wp251/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[-Immigration Court Part II- Master hearing and Individual hearing
By Attorney Farhad Sethna, Copyright 2007, all rights reserved
In part I of this series, we talked about how a case gets to immigration court and the charging document called the “Notice to Appear”(NTA). In this article, we’ll continue to explore the basics of immigration court including what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.immigration-america.com/archives/41/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

